Execute is autonomous AI: a new hire for your firm. On the clock 24 hours a day, on every active case, inside the software you already run: case management, email, documents. Nothing to learn, nothing to migrate. The attorney reviews and approves. Everything else is executed.
Open to civil plaintiff and defense law firms. Early access rolls out by practice area.
Hiring another paralegal adds coordination overhead, and when turnover comes, the training starts over at your expense.1 The problem was never your people. It is the process: work waits in a queue for a free pair of hands, the delay compounds across the caseload, and cases settle months later than they should.2 With the Execute system, your team clears the queue: a new pair of hands that never gets tired, and nothing new to learn.
Each tick is one month: an illustration of work started on day one, not a measured result.2 The gap is not lawyering. The gap is the queue.
1. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Outlook Handbook: roughly 39,300 paralegal and legal assistant openings are projected each year, most of them replacing workers who leave the occupation.
2. Federal civil cases that reach trial run a median of 31.6 months from filing to disposition; the median across all federal civil cases is 13.7 months. United States Courts, federal judiciary statistics, twelve months ending September 30, 2024. The 18 month track illustrates work started on day one. It is not a measured Execute result.
Execute is not software your firm adopts. It is a hire. A paralegal that works inside the tools you already run, takes the repetitive work off your team’s desks, and turns out work at the level of a sharp early associate. Every draft comes to you for approval, and you supervise it the way the rules already require you to supervise staff. It does not replace your people. It unburies them.
Autonomy gets claimed all over legal technology. One question cuts through the noise: who starts, works on, and completes each task? Three levels. The dot is the task. Watch who has to move it.
You type a question into a chatbot and an answer comes back. It moves only when somebody prompts it, the prompt has to be right, and every next step needs another ask.
Your steps per task: 3 of 3
Who starts the task and sees it through? You do. Every single time.
You ask for a document and a document comes back. A real step up in output, and the work still starts with you: your team finds the task, feeds the machine, and distributes what comes out.
Your steps per task: 2 of 3
Who starts the task and sees it through? You do. The tool processes.
The Execute system learns how your firm works and starts the work itself: detecting what each case needs, drafting the documents, sending the requests, tracking every matter from intake through resolution. You review and approve, the way you supervise your own paralegal. Only faster.
Your steps per task: 1. The approval.
Who starts the task and sees it through? The Execute system does. You approve.
That switch, from you starting every task to the system starting it, is the entire difference between software that helps you work and an office that works while you sleep. Nothing reaches a court or a client without your sign off. Nobody else operates at the third level.
Each product is separately purchasable and follows the life of a case. Buy one, two, or the full sequence. Execute runs on the software your firm already uses, so there is nothing to replace and nothing new to learn.
The first firm to send a signed retainer usually keeps the client. The sign up documents draft themselves the moment the call ends.
Open file → Product No. 02Medical records requested on day one and chased for the life of the case. Letters of representation sent, demand letters drafted, and the summons and complaint drafted when the case is ready.
Open file → Product No. 03Answers processed, deadlines monitored and met, discovery responses drafted before anyone opens the email.
Open file → Product No. 04Dispositive motions in your voice with every citation verified. Firms on the waitlist receive access first.
Open file →The chain compounds. Intake spawns the record requests. The records feed the complaint. The filed complaint arms the Litigation product. Run the chain end to end and the cases move themselves, the people practice law, and an attorney approves every step.
Execute learns your intake criteria, your drafting style, and your approval preferences from the way your firm already works. There is no migration project and nothing for your team to learn. Your attorneys keep their email. Your paralegals keep their process.
The system watches every active case, detects what each one needs next, and starts the work itself: sign up documents, record requests, complaint drafts, discovery responses. Around the clock, on every case at once. One person works one task at a time. The system works all of them.
Everything else is executed. Nothing leaves the firm without an attorney's sign off, which keeps your professional judgment exactly where the rules of professional conduct have always put it with your staff: supervising, responsible, in charge.
You sleep. Your cases don’t.
Documents received at midnight are answered by morning. An intake call at dinner has the retainer package out before dessert. It happens on every case at once, something no team working one task at a time can match. By the time you sit at your desk, the work you were dreading is waiting for your review instead of your effort.
“I did not study law firms from the outside. I run one. Execute exists because I lived this bottleneck every day, and nobody outside the practice of law was going to fix it the right way.”
James RubinowitzFounder and CEO. Built inside his own trial practice.
Does my firm's work train other firms' systems?
No. What Execute learns inside your firm stays inside your firm. Your drafting style never improves a competitor's results.
Where does my case data live?
In your systems. Your case management system remains the system of record. Execute works the file and puts the work product back. We are not in the business of warehousing your clients’ files.
Can anything reach a court or an adversary without an attorney signing off?
No. You approve anything filed with a court or sent to a client, exactly as you would approve an associate’s or paralegal’s work. The approval gate is the architecture of the product, not a setting someone can switch off on a busy day.
Execute is being built inside a working litigation firm. No demo theater. This is the actual state of the system.
Every intake call triggers the sign up documents, client onboarding, and the first round of record requests, with nobody lifting a pen.
The case workflow runs end to end on real matters and real discovery, expanding by case category before it expands by firm count.
The system watches the docket for discovery as it is served and drafts the response the moment a demand lands. Waitlist firms get first access.
Litigation firms join first, by practice area. The waitlist sets the order, and the earliest firms shape what ships and get each new product before anyone else.
Pilot firms onboard in fall 2026. The waitlist sets the order.
We read every submission. No automated blasts.